View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-21-2006, 01:56 PM
Monk-Eye's Avatar
Monk-Eye Monk-Eye is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 144
Monk-Eye is on a distinguished road
Credits: 1,165
Default People For The Ethical Treatement Of Animals

"People For The Ethical Treatement Of Animals"

Quote:
Originally Posted by -Locke-
So is it murder or isn't it? If it isn't, where is the line?
A baby is alive and breathing in a crib. It is murder to kill it.
A baby is alive and breathing in a womb. It is murder to kill it.
There should be no question. I also believe in a pro-choice society. People have the choice to get an abortion. They also have the choice to commit murder. Some people believe it necessary to kill a person. Thus some would consider it necessary to kill an unborn baby. But the point should be that BOTH suffer the consequences of their choices. Thus, you can very well choose to have an abortion, but you should still go to jail for it.
You lack philosophical intuitions of self worth, these should help:
Suffering The Human Animal Video,
and,
Self Reflection And Neural Systems.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nemo
The issue is not how you define "life"; but rather how the law defines a "person."
I believe we do agree -
Imprinting

BTW, em am still an omnivore.
__________________
Faith Freedom Org
Their Motto - I WILL REMOVE THIS SITE IF PROVEN WRONG
Reply With Quote