Quote:
Originally Posted by raytri";p="
there is nothing with any of the documents that attest to their validity, context, etc. Some will prove to be reliable evidence of something; many will not. Many of the documents seized on by conservative bloggers as "proving" something fail to provide a "smoking gun" even if you assume the document is entirely valid and refers to what they assume it refers to.
|
So you say...
Yet, the only "evidence" supplied by those who refute them is that they are not "proven", even though some of them do
IN FACT represent factual information.
It seems that people like yourself are most likely to believe those things that support your assertions and dismiss the things that do not...
Again, picking and choosing those things depending on what it is
YOU believe rather than what the Documents say.
Why is that you suppose?
Regards,
Gaar