Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaar";p="
So you say...
Yet, the only "evidence" supplied by those who refute them is that they are not "proven", even though some of them do IN FACT represent factual information.
It seems that people like yourself are most likely to believe those things that support your assertions and dismiss the things that do not...
Again, picking and choosing those things depending on what it is YOU believe rather than what the Documents say.
Why is that you suppose?
Regards,
Gaar
|
Where is the "evidence" these documents even exist? No, the
Republican Standard does not count, that is a lying propaganda machine. Show me the independent translators who can attest to the content. Show me the govenment saying that is what these documents say. The right wing is a bunch of gullible and shallow lemmings who will believe any lie they are told.
And let me ask you a question, if Move-on claimed that they had evidence that Bush was a neo-nazi and had documents to prove it. But they could not produce the documents, and no other source claimed the documents existed, would you believe them?.
The weekly standard is a lying piece of poop. And so unless you guys can come up with a better "source", it is dismissed as another republican/straussian lie.