Quote:
Originally Posted by The12thMan";p="
When the administration ignored Dan Rather's memos, there were people who used that fact to "prove" that they were real.
|
12th, that logic doesn't really make sense. These documents would support the administration's positions and motivations for war. Why wouldn't the administration use them if they were credible? Given their track record and use of mediocre and misleading intel, this stuff must be really shoddy. Having said that, if the administration wants to bring it up in the future as evidence to support their motives, and vindication of their actions, it will deserve a much closer look. As it stands, the administration isn't even touching it. That says a lot.