Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Warfare / Military


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2008, 11:31 AM
FlakBait's Avatar
FlakBait FlakBait is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 172
usa us california
FlakBait has disabled reputation
Credits: 877
Default .:.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatriotNews View Post
Pessimism is a great thing if you are expecting a greater outcome in the end. Somehow I doubt this is the desired outcome of the democrats. This in fact is more bad news for the democrats and those internationalists who wish to see the US fail in Iraq. This is a moment to be more optimistic that pessimistic as the Iraqi government is succeeding in taking over their own security as has been the goal of coalition forces from the beginning. This is one of the things the democrats and some of the international community have been critical of the US on, and now that it is actually happening, will they now give the US the credit and congratulations on a job well done? Somehow I doubt it.
I reread what I wrote and I can’t find where you think I said there was some sort of bleak outcome to all of this. My point was that Al-Sadr never went away and that the civil unrest is something that still exists despite the surge. I don’t see any reason I should concede my point that you can’t force people to coexist with a build up of foreign troops. I also made positive remarks towards the Iraq government handling the fighting.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2008, 11:33 AM
Daybreaker's Avatar
Daybreaker Daybreaker is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,604
Daybreaker is a name known to allDaybreaker is a name known to allDaybreaker is a name known to allDaybreaker is a name known to allDaybreaker is a name known to allDaybreaker is a name known to all
Credits: 8,375
Default Darn.

Well, darn. I was hoping Sadr would stay peaceful.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2008, 12:20 PM
PatriotNews's Avatar
PatriotNews PatriotNews is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Occupied San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 1,032
usa us california
PatriotNews is a splendid one to beholdPatriotNews is a splendid one to beholdPatriotNews is a splendid one to beholdPatriotNews is a splendid one to beholdPatriotNews is a splendid one to beholdPatriotNews is a splendid one to beholdPatriotNews is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 5,214
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlakBait View Post
I reread what I wrote and I can’t find where you think I said there was some sort of bleak outcome to all of this. My point was that Al-Sadr never went away and that the civil unrest is something that still exists despite the surge. I don’t see any reason I should concede my point that you can’t force people to coexist with a build up of foreign troops. I also made positive remarks towards the Iraq government handling the fighting.
It all sounds pessimistic to me:


Quote:
Originally Posted by FlakBait View Post
We all knew this day would come. Everyone clapped their hands when Al-Sadr signed the 6 month cease fire and then we ignorantly thought there would be piece and prosperity forever. The surge didn't take away Al-Sadr's power and destroy his following. It’s time to see what the Iraqi security forces are made of and leave them to deal with this problem.

Operation setback as I called it in another thread is underway.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlakBait View Post
That’s your solution to everything isn’t it? Well making everyone complacent isn’t a winning strategy. The surge isn't helping them get along with each other. I'm happy that the Iraqi's are really handling this pretty much on their own.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlakBait View Post
If the ceasefire that most of the Sadrists followed collapses your going to have a real hard time convincing anyone there isn’t a civil war going on.
"Operation Setback...The surge isn't helping...civil war going on..." Sound rather defeatist to me. If I am somehow wrong and you mean this some other way, I don't see it frankly. If you are not trying to downplay the successes we have had recently, then what are you saying? Seems like it is a time to be optimistic about a brighter future for Iraq.
__________________
"We should Invade Their Countries, Kill Their Leaders, and Convert Them to Christianity." Ann Coulter
There is a fine line between a subtle nuance and an extreme dichotomy! - PatriotNews
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2008, 12:45 PM
DuH2's Avatar
DuH2 DuH2 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,084
usa
DuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant future
Credits: 45,767
Default

Quote:
Al-Sadr is back

Quote:
All I'm going to say about Al Sadr's return
Quote:
Well, darn. I was hoping Sadr would stay peaceful.

Does anyone have anything substantive showing its al Sadr himself leading this and not factions within (or used to be part of) his Militia causing the main problem in Basra??




Quote:
Iraq PM gives militants ultimatum

Militants are entrenched in Basra's back streets

Iraq's Prime Minister Nouri Maliki has given Shia militants in the southern city of Basra 72 hours to lay down their arms or face "severe penalties".
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7314904.stm
__________________
McCain 2008
"We make war that we may live in peace"
"...peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever."
"Oderint dum metuant"
"Inartful: clear and straightforward, lacking the artistry that allows subsequent self-refutation and denial."
http://members.cox.net/neddy/bobhope_kerfuffles.wmv
http://youtube.com/watch?v=RnfflRNpwKA
http://youtube.com/watch?v=j-QYIP7o2-A
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2008, 12:52 PM
Questerr Questerr is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 283
usa us texas
Questerr is a jewel in the roughQuesterr is a jewel in the roughQuesterr is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 2,104
Default ..

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuH2 View Post
Does anyone have anything substantive showing its al Sadr himself leading this and not factions within (or used to be part of) his Militia causing the main problem in Basra??
Well, nothing concrete to post here. I can tell you though that my last 6 months in Iraq were dedicated to taking that rat bastard down. He keeps a close hold on operations of the Mahdi's Army. And he has a long reach, he was able to continue coordinating operations even from safe havens in Iran.

I'm dead certain he's calling the shots here.
__________________
sputterman: "Aiding the enemy? If the truth aids the enemy then we are in the wrong war."
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2008, 01:04 PM
f0ca1's Avatar
f0ca1 f0ca1 is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Greatest City in the world
Posts: 3,136
usa us new york
f0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud of
Credits: 12,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuH2 View Post
Does anyone have anything substantive showing its al Sadr himself leading this and not factions within (or used to be part of) his Militia causing the main problem in Basra??
They're clearly not under his control.

But, Sadr clearly isn't helping the situation...

Quote:
The Iraqi cleric Moqtada al-Sadr has demanded that the country's prime minister leave Basra where he is overseeing a military operation to purge the southern city of its radical Shi'ite militiamen.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...6/wiraq326.xml



It's everybody's hope that Iraqis would find a way to resolve their differences peacefully, for the good of everybody involved, but things don't look quite as good as some people want us to believe.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg wiraq326a.jpg (35.7 KB, 0 views)
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2008, 01:15 PM
DuH2's Avatar
DuH2 DuH2 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,084
usa
DuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant future
Credits: 45,767
Default

Questerr you will have no problems in agreement with me on the idea that al Sadr right now should be a few years dead corpse.
But thats beside the point
__________________
McCain 2008
"We make war that we may live in peace"
"...peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever."
"Oderint dum metuant"
"Inartful: clear and straightforward, lacking the artistry that allows subsequent self-refutation and denial."
http://members.cox.net/neddy/bobhope_kerfuffles.wmv
http://youtube.com/watch?v=RnfflRNpwKA
http://youtube.com/watch?v=j-QYIP7o2-A
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 08:51 AM
DJDaddio DJDaddio is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: On a hill over looking a river in a nice metro area near St. Louis, MO
Posts: 11
usa us missouri
DJDaddio is on a distinguished road
Credits: 229
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatriotNews View Post
Pessimism is a great thing if you are expecting a greater outcome in the end. Somehow I doubt this is the desired outcome of the democrats. This in fact is more bad news for the democrats and those internationalists who wish to see the US fail in Iraq. This is a moment to be more optimistic that pessimistic as the Iraqi government is succeeding in taking over their own security as has been the goal of coalition forces from the beginning. This is one of the things the democrats and some of the international community have been critical of the US on, and now that it is actually happening, will they now give the US the credit and congratulations on a job well done? Somehow I doubt it.
You guys all repeat the same refrain, the Dems are Unpatriotic, Dems want the U.S. to fail in Iraq, the Dems are upset about War Debt. Do you know who is currently loaning the U.S. money for Bushies arrogant schemes? The Saudis and the Chinese, and you and me and Dems and Bushie boys are going to be paying our tax dollars to Islamists and Communists for the rest of our lives. We don't have money to repair federal hiways or to fund all the programs a "Government of the People" needs. In a country of 300 Million is it really possible for everyone to "pull themselves up by their bootstraps"?
The Dems want to help the people of this country who are largely being ignored by the Bush Admin. We pay taxes, why shouldn't we benefit from the tithe we pay for self government? Why should I continue to support a President who doesn't give a (*)(*)(*)(*) about the people who Pay His Salary?
The president promised to Hunt Down and Bring to Justice the Perpetrator of 9/11, Osama Bin Laden. Why does no one even talk about or remember that this was the objective of the War On Terrorism, to get Bin Laden? It's been six years since we ceased our pursuit of Bin Laden, and where are we? IN the wrong country pursuing the wrong despot, spending a Trillion dollars to achieve a wrong headed objective. And all that with no exit strategy.
This isn't the Wild West, we're not John Wayne and Clint Eastwood, and you can't settle every problem in the world with a gun.
__________________
There is no sin except stupidity. Oscar Wilde
The first casualty when war comes is Truth.

It is best to win without fighting. Chinese Proverb
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2008, 06:34 AM
White Rabbit White Rabbit is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 14
White Rabbit is on a distinguished road
Credits: 107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuH2 View Post
Does anyone have anything substantive showing its al Sadr himself leading this and not factions within (or used to be part of) his Militia causing the main problem in Basra??
Sadr himself is in Qom working on his Islamic studies and has been for many months now.

So no, Sadr was not in Basra himself, 'leading the fight'.

Last weeks fight in Basra was all about Maliki and the SIC (SIIC, SIRCI, SICI whichever initials you like) using the Iraqi Army to attempt to remove Sadrists from 'unofficial' control over Basra prior to the October Provincial elections (where Sadr is expected to kick SIC butt, particularly in places like Basra).

The only reason SIC is the largest party in Iraq right now is because the Sunnis and the Sadrists boycotted the 2006 provincial elections, allowing the SIC to gain control of a majority of the Shi'ite provinces of the central and southern region.

With the Sunnis and Sadrists promising to contest the October provincial elections, that will mean the SIC will very likely lose control over most provincial assemblies. Control over these provincial assemblies is considered critically important for mobilizing financing and support for the next round of national elections.

The failure of Maliki's campaign was a failure for the Iraqi government, failure for the Iraqi Army, failure for the SIC and failure for both US and Iran in their attempts to have Iraq ruled by their chosen puppets.

The only winner last week was Sadr and the Medhi Army.

As far as I see the situation in Iraq, Sadr is the only Iraqi political figure that has risen in stature and popularity in Iraq since Saddam was deposed.

Sadr is looking like he is the one guy who just might be able to patch this mess back together again. Naturally, Iran and the USA seem to be allied in an effort to prevent this. Oddly enough, they are failing at that since Sadr is looking bigger, stronger and more popular than ever.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Will Al Sadr decide the U.S. election? Zoe Political Opinions & Beliefs 2 02-26-2008 06:17 AM
So Jesus is coming back? You keep pushing back the date... Neonimbo Religion 24 08-13-2005 09:06 PM
Does Al-Sadr need to be killed? Leonides Political Opinions & Beliefs 20 08-16-2004 02:05 PM
WITH DEMS BACK IN POWER, TERRORISTS WILL BACK OFF spiro Political Opinions & Beliefs 16 07-29-2004 11:45 AM
Now Bush Says Sadr Gets A Position shnook65 Current Events 13 06-17-2004 12:20 AM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden