Let us see if discrimination actually is a key to freedom and sanity and if the anti-discrimination lobby are leading us into a state of insanity. Years ago, we might have seen in an advertisement, something like, “The mark of the discriminating man” because in those days discrimination was associated with reason, sanity and free choice, especially free choice of association or non-association, coupled with the freedom of speech.

In those days we had good music, ethics, responsibility, sex with commitment, honesty, good manners, consideration of others and integrity where a man’s word was his bond. Society had an established basis of reference, and the older of us can remember when we could leave our property unlocked knowing that nothing would be touched. We had no need to try to be ‘politically correct’, and indeed, we would not have tolerated such nonsense because it was ‘wrong’ to be told what to believe and what to say if it was contrary to our traditional norm.

Those who have looked seriously at history are aware that when a civilisation moved away from its foundations it declined and passed away. We have moved away from our old basis of reference and values system of free moral choice to something unstable and almost totally devoid of free choice. What made the change? We allowed the idea that moral restraints were a chain that must be broken to bring in a ‘new age’ of freedom that we had to make progress and have change. But the progressives who wanted change so we could march forward into the future ‘new age’ have actually taken us backwards into jungle music, jungle sex, jungle ethics and jungle ‘me first’, with its instability, fear and uncertainty. Who really believes that one murder every three days in New Zealand is something better? Should we revert to our traditional values and freedom of choice to do right? It does not seem that any of our current politicians believe other than encouraging the jungle support for the survival of the fittest, piously providing a ‘safety net’ for those who suffer from the effects of their choice to be immoral, instead of supporting the moral who need it.

The Liberals, who were set on tolerating everything so that everyone could have every thing they wanted, have led us into a totalitarian state where regulations not only control our communications, transportation, education, and commerce, but our private property, private schools, small family-owned businesses, school curriculum and even free speech. This huge bureaucracy is intent on placing each of us in irons on the bench of a galley that is headed into the eye of a hurricane. It is taking us back to the feudal system or worse, not forward.

The objective of the rich lords and masters of the earth is to bring everyone else into a classless, sexless, raceless society that can easily be manipulated for the masters’ profit. In this state society provides a cheap labour pool that cannot fight back because they are separated by cultural differences which do not allow for agreement and which expend effort and attention by having to cope with ‘culture’, rather than the main issue. This is why the élite want to insist that every sort of discrimination is wrong. Having a lot of grey, mindless, undiscriminating mongrelised neuters fighting each other suits their purposes. To maintain this position, they have to legislate to disallow all discrimination in every way possible. It is now a crime to discriminate in their view, because people who discriminate cannot be easily controlled!

No one can deny that a minority controls every majority, whether it is Communist or Capitalist, Christian or pagan Maori. What really matters is whether or not the minority is seeking its own ends or that of the majority. World Government is not a majority amongst individuals; it is just that the leaders think they have the means of control! They create a problem and then utilise their expensive propaganda machine to suggest they can solve it through high taxation and totalitarian control.

A dictionary definition of ‘discrimination’ is “the faculty of distinguishing” and “being set apart” The word comes from the Latin and relates to things being sifted apart because they are different. It includes discerning right from wrong! There are things which have always been different by nature, and that will always be different, no matter how hard attempts are made to brainwash us into believing this is not so. Women are not the same as men in at least a dozen ways. If we point out the great composers of music are almost entirely men, does an exception overthrow the rule? The world’s smallest volume might well be The Great Female Orchestra Conductors. Next to this would be the volume, The Great Woman Sculptors, Architects and Artists. It is nonsense to deny a fact. Of course we know that the “first black”, “first woman” or first something else is major news in the controlled media.

To the planners, “truth is no defence”. It is a sin to point out where the African knowledge of the wheel, a numeral system, a calendar, mathematics, baseball, football and even musical instruments came from, even if the African is still good on the drums and hallucinogens. With one burglary every six minutes, we are no longer permitted to tell the truth about the racial composition of those committing crime. That is, we are no longer free to face facts and tell the truth.

Who really believes that black, brown and white are all the same even genetically, and that their DNA is the same? Who really believes that ignorance is education, right is left, children are adults, men are animals, women are men, children belong to the state, parents have no right to train their children in morals, there is no right to own property, misuse of money by the Government is not theft, Christ is Buddha, and oh yes, race mixing should be enforced, a foetus is not a person and queers are not queer! Is this sanity? Or are we being forced into a lunatic society run by inmates who have no freedom to discriminate?

If a person failed to discriminate between a $1-00 note and a $100-00 note because they were of a different colour, he would be fit for the asylum. It is straight deception to believe that the attempted enforcement of elimination of all differences will end all racial tension and wars. Force can never eliminate differences that are differences by nature. Force can never make beliefs and culture fit into one common mould. Should a person want to live in a morally upright way, it would be the anti-discrimination party who wants to sacrifice the righteous upon the altar of pagan [non-factual] bigotry.

It does not take much thought to conclude that where there is no free choice, there can be no democracy. Only free people can champion democracy. Only free people could support government by any form of referenda. Just why should all our politicians seek to avoid referenda at all costs? Why, we might all vote for a drop in their salaries, perks and access to the trough. We might think that $10,000-00 per hour to run Parliament is just too much burden on the taxpayers. It is time we thought for ourselves and stopped our opinions being moulded for us by the media and through their favoured Politicians For World Government. In their view, the right to your own opinion only exists if you agree with what they are promoting.

Discrimination is a supposed evil, just like racism is a supposed evil. Just because we may have preference for one of our own race does not say that we hate other races. It simply is not generally true. Our racial imports each prefer to live within their own culture, and we could equally pretend that they hate us. Sometimes they do, of course, but this is not in general unless this is promoted! We can observe that the Maori want their own culture to have priority and do not feel friendly towards those who do not want their religion. Preference does not have to mediate prejudice. With two races there is only one cultural area of conflict. With four races this increases to six. With six races this increases to fifteen potential areas of cultural conflict! The more we increase the number of races, the more we increase the cultural tensions. So, what should our immigration policy be? Racial intermarriage again produces another set of tensions. This is the nature of things but once Maori and European lived easily together because each was treated as an equal with equality in law. This brought mutual respect. Where there is respect, there is no bad-mouthing. Anti-Discrimination promotes selfishness, greed, jealousy and the very racial hatred they legislate to try to eliminate.

When it comes to business, we are losing the right to hire and fire staff as we would like to in order to ensure that a business might make a profit and so that it can continue to provide employment. Of course, the more unemployment, the more cheap labour there is for big business who benefit from being able to close down the family businesses, which history proves provide the most employment opportunities. When we consider the move towards what the U.N. calls, “the religion free workplace” where a person is not allowed to communicate to others in the workplace what he discriminates about and believes about, then Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights where it says “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression” is not a universal right at all. It is all double talk and of course we now have a law which says one cannot do something, and another law that says one has to do that thing. So they can get us or shut our mouths one way or another!!

The article continues here (around the bottom of the page)

__________________
In times of universal deceit the love of truth becomes the most radical of all ideologies.

Still a Caveman? - Your Mind is Controlled - The Brainwashing of the West - Your thoughts are not your own

Veritax Vox Liberabit