Why Are Dems Rewarding Cheaters ? You Ask !
Well Duh...dems Are Cheaters, Liars And Anti-american Activists,of Course They Reward Cheaters, They Wouldn't Survive If They Didn't.("cheat") Lie Or Otherwise Distort The Truth !

Well let's face it, democrats as a whole are compulsively lying communists who have no respect for life, property, or the constitution, and don't mind completing restricting people's most basic rights (Like when Florida's vote didn't count, notice how little news coverage that got) for their own selfish purposes.

They claim to be the agents of selflessness by robbing you of YOUR money rather then doing charity work, all that money they get for campaigning they could be spending on soup kitchens, and instead it's going into their pockets. That, and anyone who can have an abortion has no right to talk about selflessness. As regardless of how selfish I am, I would not outright kill someone just because I wanted to.


So in all the sick and peverse anti-morality that is asscosiated with democrats, does it suprise you..at all..that they cheat?

And yet the majority of the voter in 2006 chose the Democrats. I guess this means that the majority of Americans are anti-American.

Yep, guess so.


Just like the majority of british people are self-loathing, backstabbing, socialist lunatics.

Project Euro was a success.


It's like our forefathers fought for nothing. They worked their asses off to get away from England, not become them.

In the example from the article, the DNC has no right to impose terms on the taxpayers. If the DNC wants to set the dates for the primaries, then they should fund the process. As long as the taxpayers are funding the process, then it's up to them to set the dates; not the DNC.

Therefore, there hasn't been any rewarding, since there was never any cheating in the first place.

technically i wouldn't say they're rewarding cheaters.
they're simply not punishing them.
i personaly think it's stupid to have the same few states always get the early votes.
after the first few, most candidates will drop out,
most of the country never gets to vote on the whole field of choices,
only Iowa and New Hampshire.
it should rotate,
or at least all be much closer together.

i think everyone knew the states would still be seated at the convention.
they represent a lot of people who the democrats don't want to upset.
they don't want to chance democratic voters staying home, or voting non-democrat.

__________________

That was because the Democrat's made 100 promises for change in Washington. They've failed at 98 of them.

Is the Labour party really that bad in england?