View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2007, 03:17 AM
goldendog's Avatar
goldendog goldendog is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,817
goldendog has much to be proud ofgoldendog has much to be proud ofgoldendog has much to be proud ofgoldendog has much to be proud ofgoldendog has much to be proud ofgoldendog has much to be proud ofgoldendog has much to be proud ofgoldendog has much to be proud ofgoldendog has much to be proud ofgoldendog has much to be proud of
Credits: 12,310
Default The Senate: The Republican Revolt

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16610773/site/newsweek/

Jan. 22, 2007 issue - Last Tuesday afternoon, a day before President George W. Bush went on TV to explain his decision to send more troops to Iraq, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell called his Republican colleagues together for a private talk. Several GOP senators had already come out against the plan. McConnell, Bush's closest Senate supporter on Iraq, hoped to keep others from defecting. He urged his colleagues to stand together at least until Bush had the chance to speak to the country. After the meeting, the senators went outside the room to display their unity to waiting reporters. McConnell said he thought more troops were just the thing to "give us a chance to succeed." He then stepped aside so the other senators could second his sentiments. No one came forward.

A former senior Bush aide who is still close to the White House says if things don't improve, a delegation of Republican senators could one day show up in the Oval Office to tell Bush that the party is no longer with him and the war must end.

It's him and Barney till the very end.

Why is this Happening? Does Al Queada supposedly being in Iraq, and being one of the major justifications for going into Iraq, have anything to do with Bush being in this position?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest