Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth-Bringer";p="
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake";p="
To UN types, liberals, and appeasers, a dictator who commits mass murder and genocide within his borders only is no problem.
|
Actually, that's the standard policy of the CIA - ally with anyone regardless of what they're doing in their own countries if they claim they'll support U.S. interests. It's really sick because it then allows the U.S. to give more aid to these dictators which strengthens them against a possible revolt from their own people. But hey - that's not what the good ole U.S. of A wants... We want to stick our noses into everyone else's business and let our young men die for them and let our taxpayers pay to overthrow their dictators. Yeah, that's the way we do it... |
Gosh, yet ANOTHER hoary chesnut! The US trafficked with dictatorships because we had to deal with them in the context of the Cold War. You're really digging to the bottom of the barrel in a desperate search for a credible anti-US defamation. Here's one for you - we allied with the soviet union to defeat Hitler!!! Garsh, libs supported that! Can you imagine!
Quote:
Quote:
|
But how would you expect people who are the supporters of the abortion holocaust to think? Wars are bad, "quiet" mass exterminations are no problem.
|
Except that - WHOOPS - I'm Pro-Life... Now who's consistent? I'm pro-life, against pre-emptive wars, and against the death penalty, while supporting the right to bear arms for personal defense.
|
Yeah, but you have no problem with Saddam's mass exterminations? Gee, I thinlk I'll call you Mr. Consistency!
Quote:
Quote:
|
Ah ha, the last refuge of an appeaser getting his ass kicked in debate - trot out the hoary old donald rumsfeld helping the iraqis chestnut - as usual, shorn of the geopolitical context of that help.
|
It proves conclusively that your side is hypocritical and inept. And that's why their wonderful war in Iraq is failing miserably...
|
It proves the appeaser brain shorts out if a geopolitical situation gets more complicated than tic-tac-toe.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Yes, but that's what you appeasers want - abandon the difficult democracy project and leave it to which islamofascist tribe comes out on top.
|
Well, that's what's going to happen anyway, Einstein, regardless of what anyone wants, because your Master Bush has set it up that way. I know you hate to consider something called the truth, but it's there for all to see:
The (Islamic) Republic of Iraq
A Strange Sort of Freedom
by Jeffrey Tucker
You know that you are living in strange times when a single news item on the Iraqi Constitution contains supporting comments from Bush ("completing the next step in their transition from dictatorship to democracy... this constitution is good for all Iraqis and that it adequately reflects compromises suitable to all groups") and an open admission that the constituion erects an Islamic state that robs women of rights they had taken for granted under the regime that the US overthrew:
"Under the new constitution, Islam would become the official religion of the Iraqi state, and be regarded as "a main source of legislation." Clerics would more than likely sit on the Supreme Court, and judges would have broad latitude to strike down legislation that conflicted with the religion. Clerics would be given a broad, new role in adjudicating family disputes like marriage, divorce and inheritance. Under most interpretations of Islamic law, women enjoy substantially fewer rights than men."
Here is the text of the Iraqi Constitution, which claims that it was written with help from "heavenly messages." Heaven, it seems, has led the drafters of the document to qualify every freedom and right with the proviso: "This shall be regulated by law."
As for economics: oil, education, and health are decisively nationalized.
http://blog.mises.org/blog/archives/004012.asp
|
Ooooooooooooooo ..... a country that goes from a 12th century medieval culture to a democracy overnight without meeting the standards of the ACLU should be consigned to islamofascism then, huh? What did the U.S. have when it started out - slavery, no women's suffrage - goll' somebody should of nipped the US in the bud.