View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2007, 07:29 AM
ashleykennedy's Avatar
ashleykennedy ashleykennedy is offline
Banned
Analyst
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 2,287
uk european union
ashleykennedy is an unknown quantity at this point
Credits: 24,033
Default What would bombing achieve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildbore";p=&quot View Post
I agree that military options should be on the table, and not removed until there is proof of Iran's complaince.

I can't find a link but I think Iran was going to comply with UN resolutions by placing cameras in their underground facilities. I heard this on either BBC or CBC. Hopefully this is true because it would be a relief to the world to find out what Iran is doing.
Does the US have the military capability for use against Iran. Yes the US could bomb Iran but what affect would that have in Iraq? Could the US invade Iran, I doubt it?

The IAEA has cameras inside the Natanz facility. The cameras are immaterial as it is what Iran proposes to do with the enriched uranium that is important. Is it for electric production or bombs. Has Iran resurected the US plan to build 23 Nuclear power station or is Iran a threat to stability in the ME? Not that there is stability in the ME at the moment.

Iran is still a long way off having a capability to make a bomb. For the moment the military option is a waste of time.
Reply With Quote