Quote:
Me: From what you have posted so far she is not being hypocritical. Period. Yes, you were wrong.
Maybe hypocrite was a poor choice of words.
|
If by "poor choice" you mean "completely wrong" then I agree.
Quote:
|
Sometimes in my haste I pick a word that doesn't quite fit the point I'm trying to make.
|
Sort of like when people say Bush lied. Same thing.
Quote:
|
She is benefiting from a law she vehemently opposes. You understand that right?
|
Yeah, so what? So am I.
I am violently opposed to the anti-smoking laws here in Denver, even though they definitely benefit me.
The fact that a law benefits you doesnt mean you are wrong to oppose it. Not sure where you got that idea.
Quote:
|
If it's not hypocritical, it's still disingenuous.
|
Nope. It's only
disingenuous if she is not really being sincere. I have seen no evidence that she is not sincere in what she is saying she believes.
Quote:
|
It's like a welfare recipient coming here and writing about how the welfare system is a waste of tax payers money and undermining our cultural values and must be abolished.
|
Not really. Because the welfare recipient had a choice to recieve welfare. Michelle Malkin did not have a choice regarding the circumstances of her birth, or the resulting gift of citizenship.
Quote:
|
Well, if Malkin were sincere, she'd have renounced her citizenship, moved back to the Philippines, and worked to regain her citizenship the old fashion way.
|
I disagree. I am sincere about being against abortion even though it will never affect me. I dont need to get a woman pregnant to test my sincerity.
You are biased against her, which is why you make assumptions that people without bias would not.