View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2007, 11:43 AM
Rebellion's Avatar
Rebellion Rebellion is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 14,588
usa
Rebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 141,886
Default Sure it does

Quote:
Originally Posted by ashleykennedy";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rebellion";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by apotropoxy";p=&quot View Post
Last year Ernst Uhrlau, the head of German intelligence, said Tehran would not be able to produce enough material for a nuclear bomb before 2010 and would only be able to make it into a weapon by about 2015.


Worry not, D.
The War Criminal-In-Chief is using those old shaped charged explosive devices which have been killing our GIs for the last three years as his pretext to attack Persia. You won't have to wait long.
The Supreme Leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, informed the world last week that American interests around the world will be targeted if we attack his country.
You are a GloryWarrior and are welcomed to enlist in Bush the Lame's "long war."
Wonderful idea, let's wait until 2010 to do something about it. No wonder the dems are viewed so poorly when it comes to national security. I wonder who the dems will nominate to be Appeaser in Chief in '08.
And what would you propose to do now?

Bomb and end up with a more radical regime in Iran?
Or invade, and where would you get troops from?

The US does not have a military option.
It can bomb the ever living bejeezus out of their facilities. That won't necessarily mean a regime change. Israel did the same thing with Iraq and Saddam still stayed in power. That said, if it ousted the current leader, who isn't even liked by many of his own people, the chances are better of someone less radical entering in his place than someone more radical.
__________________
All you need to know about the energy crisis:
ANWR Exploration Republicans: 91% Supported. Democrats: 86% Opposed.
Coal-to-liquid R's: 90% YES. D's: 78% NO.
Oil Shale Exploration R's: 90% YES. D's: 86% NO.
Outer Continental Shelf Exploration R's: 81% YES. D's: 83% NO.
Increased Refinery Capacity R's: 97% YES. D's: 96% NO

SUMMARY: 91% of House Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of America’s own oil and gas. 86% of House Democrats have historically voted against.
Reply With Quote