View Single Post
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2007, 06:42 AM
Kate25's Avatar
Kate25 Kate25 is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 135
Kate25 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 811
Default Re:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joker";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kate25
What the hell is "bukakae"?
It's actually spelled "bukkake." It's Japanese, and I'm pretty sure you don't really wan to know what it means, although you can check it out on wikipedia if you just can't resist. It is, however, a fitting metaphor for WW3.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kate25";p=&quot View Post
I agree that all the countries in that region including Israel and Pakistan should get rid of their nukes.
That would never happen unless the US and the rest of the developed world got rid of all their nukes as well. Nukes have become the ace card that any developing needs to face off with the big boys (look at how we kiss NK ass now). Even if we destroy Iran's capabilities to make nukes, they still keep working at it.
I guess you're right. Countries that already have nuclear weapons won't give them up unless we achieve world peace or something. That's why Iran getting nukes is a step in the wrong direction. If they get them then more countries will want them. Either we believe in non-proliferation and we stop more countries from getting them, or we allow more and more people to have the capability to kill millions of people and bring our fragile world closer to the brink of catastrophe.

As for that other thing. You're right. Somethings I really don't need to know.
__________________
Love Angel Music Baby
Reply With Quote