Yes Abu, that might be so, but what Myth are you in fact attempting to debunk .... (just to show that I don't ignore you completely when you fail to place your own conclusion in a post).

I suspect you might be trying to debunk the Myth 2, that the majority of Arabs in the contested area (Palestine and Israel) are decendents of immigrants who arrived following the Zionist settlers.

1) If that is so, then you seem to be suggesting that Jerusalem represents the entirity of the disputed "Holy land". Naturally I disagree with that.

2) Otherwise you are suggesting that if you can show immigration to be a factor in a tiny piece of a territory, then it must also be so for the 99% of the remaining territory. I view that as being unsubstantiated based on accepted principals of logic.

So please tell us, what was your post meant to debunk?