Change 'many' to 'some' and I'll concede that point.
Quote:
|
i don't remember saying that. but let me make it clear, on this we have (rare) agreement. there are men who could not cast a ballot for a woman, nor an African-American, nor a homosexual, nor a native Spanish speaker ...
|
I'll agree with part of that. But we're not talking about the same man here. The male ego supercedes any other prejudices. Most men don't understand the male ego very well. Women understand it from a very early age. In fact, it's at the root of why men find women 'mysterious'.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bubba
we part company on this one, all around. hillary has not ridden in on bill's coattail. she is the smarter of the two (and definately the colder). she is smart enough to use the "bill" advantage to her benefit. and you allude to why "bill" as a spouse is not always an asset. if she had divorced her philandering spouse you would have cited that as a negative against her saying she did not live up to her oath of "for better or worse".
|
No chance of that. My personal religious beliefs allow divorce in the case of unfaithfulness. Besides, divorce is not the vote-killer it used to be. If I thought she stayed married to Bill because of love rather than megalomania, I'd have a different opinion.
Quote:
|
being someone who has received more than his share of one more last chances from his wife, her not ditching bill is, other than her intellect, the thing that would allow me to strongly support her. besides, eatin aint cheatin
|
Oh no. You did not just say that.