trolling - Page 7

B L Zeebub · #61 (**permalink**) 05-09-2008, 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheChief

irony.....

Chief the Fragrant Mrs B L Zeebub, a devotee of Bushido noticed your picture in the members thread, she will send you a private with advice on your dress, cadence and grip.
But incase she forgets a few pointers below.

She finds your choice of rather ornate swords, with your shorts and shaved armpits, may have given rise to BB questioning your masculinity, she stated you should wear a "Hakama" over a "Kimono" the formal attire of a warrior and not soil the image of "Bushido" with your homoerotic poses

The lavender behind you looks good, as do the roses in your flower bed

BillyBob · #62 (**permalink**) 05-10-2008, 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B L Zeebub

Chief the Fragrant Mrs B L Zeebub,

I can only imagine....

Quote:

a devotee of Bushido noticed your picture in the members thread, she will send you a private with advice on your dress, cadence and grip.
But incase she forgets a few pointers below.

She finds your choice of rather ornate swords, with your shorts and shaved armpits, may have given rise to BB questioning your masculinity, she stated you should wear a "Hakama" over a "Kimono" the formal attire of a warrior and not soil the image of "Bushido" with your homoerotic poses

I'm laughing my (*)(*)(*)(*)ing head off!

TheChief · #63 (**permalink**) 05-10-2008, 03:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B L Zeebub

Chief the Fragrant Mrs B L Zeebub, a devotee of Bushido noticed your picture in the members thread, she will send you a private with advice on your dress, cadence and grip.
But incase she forgets a few pointers below.

She finds your choice of rather ornate swords, with your shorts and shaved armpits, may have given rise to BB questioning your masculinity, she stated you should wear a "Hakama" over a "Kimono" the formal attire of a warrior and not soil the image of "Bushido" with your homoerotic poses

The lavender behind you looks good, as do the roses in your flower bed

oww.. goody...

Publius Infinitum · #64 (**permalink**) 05-10-2008, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raytri

No. Trolling isn't allowed. The exact location of the line between trolling and legitimate posting is, of course, rather subjective. We tend to err on the side of allowing posts rather than deleting them. But if we think it's trolling, it's gone. If it becomes a pattern of behavior, the troll can be banned.

ROFLMNAO...

This is absolute nonsense.. Big Red has been trolling the "**** the troops" thread for a week and niether Ray nor any other mod has done a thing about it.

But let someone call a leftist something other than "Sire" and BAM! They're on you like ignorance on an independent, moderate, centrist, secular progressive...

FYI: Trolling is simply positions advanced without regard to or for the thread... where one advances a position and its soundly refuted, yet they keep advancing it as uncontested fact. On most sites, a report of trolling gets some response, but my reports to the mods got no response and they just allowed him to continue to vomit the same vacuous screed which had been refuted by a half a dozen separate members...

i.beletesri · #65 (**permalink**) 05-10-2008, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Publius Infinitum

ROFLMNAO...

This is absolute nonsense.. Big Red has been trolling the "**** the troops" thread for a week and niether Ray nor any other mod has done a thing about it.

But let someone call a leftist something other than "Sire" and BAM! They're on you like ignorance on an independent, moderate, centrist, secular progressive...

FYI: Trolling is simply positions advanced without regard to or for the thread... where one advances a position and its soundly refuted, yet they keep advancing it as uncontested fact. On most sites, a report of trolling gets some response, but my reports to the mods got no response and they just allowed him to continue to vomit the same vacuous screed which had been refuted by a half a dozen separate members...

That's the Bitsy-Brain moderator core here.
They pursue the 'insult' rule to the great exclusion of Grotesque violations like Foolosophy's Trolling Strings.. even DUPLICATE Trolling strings.

The rule about "looking for similar strings before you post" is violated every 10 minutes here- but that's too complex for Laurel and Hardy.

No not only did Foolosophy Not look for others.. he Created his own Duplicate strings.

And this is hardly a lone incident. Duplicate strings are rampant in every section that should be deleted- added to the end of others or moved to correct sections.
They tried that once with all the Obama strings and Screwed SO bad they're back to 'their thing'.

Me? I get an infraction from catzmeow, for calling trolling what it is.

catzmeow · #66 (**permalink**) 05-10-2008, 05:21 PM

Dear Poster Beletesri:

Referring to other posters as trolls is a violation of forum rules. In the future, rather than calling other posters out, by name, with personal insults, you may wish to consider reporting threads that you consider violations to the mods.

You may need a refresher course on the rules, and you can find them here:

http://www.politicalforum.com/latest-world-news/27568-here-rules-board.html

Here is the rule in question:

Avoid personal attacks. This is probably the most subjective of guidelines; however, approach it like this: ATTACK THE MESSAGE, NOT THE MESSENGER.

Many topics are emotionally charged. This passion for what one believes in should remain in the discourse. However, please refrain from attacking another user in a personal way. Personal attacks do not contribute to a debate. While you may attack a user's ideas, views, political affiliation, political party, political candidate, government, etc... you must not attack the poster personally. Those who engage in this may get a private warning, a public warning, or even have their posting deleted. Continued disregard towards this guideline may result in being banned from this board.

xoxox,

Catz

SpankyTheWhale · #67 (**permalink**) 05-10-2008, 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by catzmeow

Dear Poster Beletesri:

Referring to other posters as trolls is a violation of forum rules. In the future, rather than calling other posters out, by name, with personal insults, you may wish to consider reporting threads that you consider violations to the mods.

You may need a refresher course on the rules, and you can find them here:

http://www.politicalforum.com/latest-world-news/27568-here-rules-board.html

Here is the rule in question:

Avoid personal attacks. This is probably the most subjective of guidelines; however, approach it like this: ATTACK THE MESSAGE, NOT THE MESSENGER.

Many topics are emotionally charged. This passion for what one believes in should remain in the discourse. However, please refrain from attacking another user in a personal way. Personal attacks do not contribute to a debate. While you may attack a user's ideas, views, political affiliation, political party, political candidate, government, etc... you must not attack the poster personally. Those who engage in this may get a private warning, a public warning, or even have their posting deleted. Continued disregard towards this guideline may result in being banned from this board.

xoxox,

Catz

Just what I would expect from a CAT!

i.beletesri · #68 (**permalink**) 05-10-2008, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by catzmeow

Dear Poster Beletesri:

Referring to other posters as trolls is a violation of forum rules. In the future, rather than calling other posters out, by name, with personal insults, you may wish to consider reporting threads that you consider violations to the mods.

You may need a refresher course on the rules, and you can find them here:

http://www.politicalforum.com/latest-world-news/27568-here-rules-board.html

Here is the rule in question:

Avoid personal attacks. This is probably the most subjective of guidelines; however, approach it like this: ATTACK THE MESSAGE, NOT THE MESSENGER.

Many topics are emotionally charged. This passion for what one believes in should remain in the discourse. However, please refrain from attacking another user in a personal way. Personal attacks do not contribute to a debate. While you may attack a user's ideas, views, political affiliation, political party, political candidate, government, etc... you must not attack the poster personally. Those who engage in this may get a private warning, a public warning, or even have their posting deleted. Continued disregard towards this guideline may result in being banned from this board.

xoxox,

Catz

The question is whether Foolosophy is a Troll, whether 'troll' is even an insult at all, especially to one .. indeed, whether he would even deny it.

You are a very poor and petty mod as I outlined above.

Ignoring grotesque violations and .. er.. trolling, in favor of the bitsy 'insult' rule which probably isn't even applicable here.
And even if it was, it's so minor considering the provocative posts/strings of Foolo, it's poor judgment to use it such.

Alas you were not ready for prime time, while metrophobe was- tho he still needs practise and you both need to work on the bigger more complex violations/Structural Board disruptions/fragmentations instead of playing meter maids with the only rule you seem to know.

catzmeow · #69 (**permalink**) 05-10-2008, 05:33 PM

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode