Like the "scientists" who profess to simply speak global warming into existence without use of known scientific procedure, they also presume to simply speak "discredit" into existence of those who oppose their claims.

The "discredited" scources opposing the global warming scam, are only "discredited" by the scammers themselves, and you "faithful" who require no proof of their claims. Their data is less inclusive than that of the growing number of honest scientists who are simply cast off as "discredited." That's exactly the point that makes global warming a "religion" rather than a science. Repeatability of proper scientific processes leading to consistent results is what determines science,
not a popular knee-jerk vote followed by mere verbal comdemnation for opposing opinions.

Where is your base data that's been denied to those opposing your "guru" Mann? Show the logic in simply disregarding all known data concerning Earth's history of climate change prior to mankind's existence, that disputes the human influence over weather. Show scientific logic in disregarding Mars' known climate changes in order to believe your scammers without question. And , of course, show how the changes in the Sun's radiation are but inconsequential to the "huge" effects of incandescent light bulbs in bringing about global climate change.

There are no answers to the above challenges anyone with common sense would require................ NONE. And gullible who accept this scam without question, will be left exposed for the fools you are, when this current scare tactic submerges back into oblivion right after Al Gore is again rejected by American voters.

The [b]good[/b] news for you gullible dupes though, is that I have a couple on NYC bridges for sale, along with some great New Orleans real estate. Now, line up with your checkbooks in your hands........... .