Do you "true believers" even know what the IPCC is and who the UN contracted to "research" the global warming question? Michael Mann, an analyst.....not even a scientist, that's who. The guy I've been describing and who is exposed along with his co-conspirators Raymond Bradley, and Malcom Hughes are the ones who edited the data to conform to their desired conclusion of man-made global warming. Actual "scientists" the scammers listed in their "consensus" have come forward stating their dismay at their analyses being altered to reflect a different conclusion than they actually have..............altered by guess who..........the IPCC's own Michael Mann and Co...........the authors of the IPCC report you fell for. They have refused to remove the names of scientists they listed in their faked "consensus," and only recently have done so in instances where forced by threat of lawsuits. Does that look like rational scientific procedure?


Raytri tried to disrespect the article I linked that summed up (I couldn't very well link entire books) the findings of actual scientists (not book-cooking analysists) opposing such non-scientific measures used to justify the IPCC report. The books containing the exposed fraud are at the end of the article and include "Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1500 years" by Fred Singer and Dennis Avery, and "Shattered Consensus" by Patrick Michaels.

Although some of the legitimate authorities find it easier to simply give the IPCC report a nod rather than endure the inevitable barrage of name-calling from the left, to date there has been ZERO corroboration of the IPCC report that's been verified by real scientists who re-traced all the steps used by Mann and his co-conspirators. NONE. Those who have, found vast inconsistencies with the "findings" in the report.

Now, how about the common sense I asked you about in excluding Earth's history of climate change from the "data."

You people remind me of the powers that be who demanded Galileo's complicity under threat of death for opposing their pre- determined "consensus."