Quote:
Originally Posted by Joker";p="
Either we stay until we have successfully completed our mission, or we immediately after we admit defeat and surrender. That's usually the way it's done, no? Have we ever named an end date for any war before successfully completing the task at hand?
|
It is such a LAME excuse when people say the USA will leave after they "successfully complete the mission."
What is the requirements for success?
It use to be when they got rid of Saddam.
Then it was when Iraq formed it's own government.
now?
what?
When they stop Terrorists from coming into Iraq?
Better start building that wall around the country.
Terrorists will continue to enter Iraq as long as there are American soldiers to kill.
Look at Afghanistan.
The terrorists are still there since 911.
Sure there have been successes there but the "war on terror" is still going on in Afghanistan.
When they kill all the Iraqi Insurgence?
The longer the America stay and "Occupies" Iraq, the easier it is for insurgence to recruit new members.
Is it when Iraq has a huge Army?
4 years and they still don't have a huge army to defend themselves.
Please tell me what the specific definition is for success in Iraq.
Don't use the broad lame excuses like
"when Iraq can stand on there own"
That is such a lame crock of an excuse.
If you are waiting for the 3 groups to finally kiss and make up, Iraq might just as well become the 51, 52 and 53 States of America.
Divide up Iraq into 3 new States for America.
Please tell us here what else have to be accomplished in Iraq?