How morally sick can the USA military get?

The US is also considering using smaller nuclear devices in the theatre of war.

Its Not really that surprising though, The US has used nuclear bombs and chemical warfare on civilians before haven't they FOLKS!

IN GOD WE TRUST!

http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/0...emical_we.html

__________________
Supreme Executive for the I.S.S.F

__________________
Calling Grace She'll Never Fall Again Love Remains In Her Calling Grace
She Will Rise Again Sacrifice The Saints Still Love Remains
I'm A Tart! What! You Want Some Of This!
I would Tarja...among other things...

You got your source from a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing blog. I'll wait for the news papers to write up an article.

I also find it interesting how much you hat the United States

__________________

the article mentions chmical weapons as the non-letahl kind such as sticky foam and calming agents... i see nothing wrong with that.

which do you prefer, dropping a bomb or dropping a sticky foam bomb? i can see situations where that would be much more helpful like when were trying to catch a guy that we want to interrogate.. its better then dropping a bomb and possibly causing collateral damage.

yes,
beachbum is right.
the article speaks of 'non-lethal' weapons.
but, of course, you make it sound as though the US is about ready to start nuking and gassing the world.

here's a quote from the article
and oh my God,
why WOULDN'T we use non-lethal weapons.
the article made a good point about what we can use on our own people,
versus what we can use on our enemies in war.

and if the US was so interested in using any of our nukes,
we could've found more than enough opportunities in the last 60+ years.
the fact we've only done it twice
is a testament to our self-control.

__________________

I notice you POST the words "Purity of Essence" after each of your comments.

Are the chemicals that the USA has stock piled and wishes to implement in the theatre of war as pure as your "Purity of Essence"?

What if a nation used these so-called NON-LETHAL weapons and chemical weapons against US forces around the world? IS THAT OK WITH YOU?

Or are these purity of essence NON-LETHAL chemical weapons only to used by the MORALLY superior armies of the USA?

What if a neighbouring country of Israel dropped these PURITY OF ESSENCE NON-LETHAL chemical weapons on Israeli Defense force personell?

That would be OK wouldn't it SKOOTER?

Your hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy has no bounds it would seem

__________________
Supreme Executive for the I.S.S.F

oh please.
any attack on the US or israel with ANY weapon is not ok.
but if a nation or terrorist attacked us or israel with tear-gas,
i'd be pretty thankful.
unfortunately they like suicide-bombs,
and IEDs.
attacking them with non-lethal weapons would be extending them a courtesy NONE of them would show us in return.
you act like we're evil for advocating the use of 'non-lethal' weaponry.
and yeah, i would call that 'purity of essence'.
being able to extend civility to your enemy that they probably would laugh at us for.

my 'hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy"
is outdone only by your inability to grasp the meaning of your own referenced article.

you do know what 'non-lethal' means, don't you?

__________________

"Purity of Essense"

Skooter's Joke of the century

__________________
Supreme Executive for the I.S.S.F

ok
buh bye now

__________________