View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2007, 07:01 PM
raytri's Avatar
raytri raytri is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minnesota
Age: 41
Posts: 17,637
usa us minnesota
raytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 110,883
Default dgdgdg

Quote:
Originally Posted by MerlinX";p=&quot View Post
Pretty much. I don't have a problem with income inequality. I think it's a good thing. Or, would you rather everyone earned the same, regardless of ability or effort?
Yeah, like I was arguing for complete income equality. It's not a binary question, it's a spectrum. Gross inequality is nearly as bad as state-ordered equality.

Quote:
This widening income gap does not mean that people are getting poor so much as others are getting rich. And there is nothing wrong with this. Or are we now to judge wealth (or lack thereof) by what others have, rather than what we ourselves have?
When real wages for the bottom 90 percent of earners are falling, your thesis doesn't hold.
__________________
Man up.
Reply With Quote