View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2007, 09:48 AM
raytri's Avatar
raytri raytri is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minnesota
Age: 41
Posts: 18,554
usa us minnesota
raytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 115,961
Default dgdgdg

Quote:
Originally Posted by The12thMan";p=&quot View Post
According to the latest stats available at irs.gov for the year 2003, the top 5% had an income share of 32.53% and a tax share of 53.52%.
You're getting your data from the Tax Foundation, aren't you?

Even taking their analysis at face value, if you factor in the IRS estimate that it only captures 70% of nonwage income, then the income share for the wealthy should be adjusted upward to about 46.5%, since they have the vast majority of nonwage income. At that point you're getting pretty close to a flat tax.

And, as always, that analysis ignores payroll taxes, property taxes and sales taxes, all of which hit the less affluent (as a percentage of income) far more heavily than they do the rich.
__________________
Man up.
Reply With Quote