View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2007, 11:43 PM
CBBrooklyn CBBrooklyn is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 38
CBBrooklyn is on a distinguished road
Credits: 784
Default and where's the scientific analysis?

Quote:
Originally Posted by meta4mind";p=&quot View Post
In the absence of some necessary condition in the prima facie explanation of the fall of the towers, the introduction of a flimsy premise of conspiracy places an onerous burden of the conspiracy theorist. What appeared before thousands of live and millions of IT witnesses -- 2 airliners smashing into 2 vulnerable towers leaves only remote hypothetical room for other accounts. Conspiracy theories usually issue from those obsessed with conspiracies, almost to the point that if there had never been conspirators to conspire, history would never been instigated and nothing would ever have happened.

The above is total nonsense, and does not refute any of the scientific evidence. The only conspiracy theorists that exist are those who believe such nonsense as the government/corporate media's version of events.
Reply With Quote