View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2007, 11:39 AM
The12thMan's Avatar
The12thMan The12thMan is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,295
usa us texas
The12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 139,640
Default JJJJJJJJJ

Quote:
Setting aside the difference in influence between a veep and a minority Senator, I'll make two points: I've never been one of those people demonizing Cheney over Halliburton, and two wrongs don't make a right. If you thought Cheney was just fine, then you can't complain about Feinstein.
If Feinstein's husband had given up his ties to these companies BEFORE she took the position, you'd have a good point.
http://www.factcheck.org/article261.html

Quote:
Not what I said. My point was that for it to be a conflict of interest, there has to be a credible mechanism by which Feinstein could use her position to benefit her husband. I don't see one, *especially* because she was in the minority and so would have to convince multiple Republicans to go along with her.
You lose this argument, raytri. How can you say she doesn't have conflict of interest when something like $1.5 BILLION was awarded to companies her husband had ties to. It's like you're saying she couldn't possibly be interested in these contracts because her vote didn't count. Wow.
__________________
Do you know what it's like to fall in the mud and get kicked... in the head... with an iron boot? Of course you don't, no one does. It never happens. It's a dumb question... skip it.
Reply With Quote