04-30-2007, 10:11 PM
|
 |
Guru
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: right behind you
Age: 2
Posts: 3,449
|
|
Well, I missed one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tedminator";p="
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpankyTheWhale";p="
I may not like some of your political opinions, and I might think you are sometimes more aggressive than you need to be, but moderator involvement is not what I think is warranted here. This is of course from what I have seen of your posts. This means that by definition I haven't seen the posts that have been deleted, and maybe they did deserve to be deleted. Maybe, although I do not think it is necessary, your account should be deleted based on the statements you made in the deleted posts. Again, I can't know the answer because I haven't seen the deleted posts. However, if they are, indeed, random deletions, then I can base my opinion on the posts of yours that I have seen. In that case, I have already expressed my view that your posts should not suffer deletion. In fact, I cannot think of a single regular or semi-regular poster that I know of who does deserve deletion of their account or even deletions of their posts.
|
Hmmm jake has umm, shall we say a long record of past transgressions.
Heres an example: http://www.politicalforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=26663
He and I had a history of butting heads... although he's been behaving recently. Dunno how much of it is self control or moderator action. Probably a little of both  |
Looks like I didn't see that one. It appears that you listed certain contradictions that in your view made him a bit of hypocrite as a matter of course, a standard operating procedure, and he lashed out at you with a heinous, completey unwarranted accusation. It was an accusation where even if it happened to be true in your case, he could not have known, nor have had any evidence for it, and it could only be considered an act of libel and slander.
__________________
I think America is finally ready for another president with polio.
|