View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2007, 08:19 AM
Rebellion's Avatar
Rebellion Rebellion is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 13,995
usa
Rebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 124,424
Default I don't think I'll let you arrest us today, Beehan.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty";p=&quot View Post
Although Katie sounds like a nice person (who could hate someone whose interests include movies and ice cream?), I don't quite follow her reasoning -- what do abortion and gay rights have to do with "scientific progress?" These are all questions of morals and ethics. If Katie thinks science should run free without first considering the underlying ethics, she hasn't seen enough movies.
I think the "science" part is a red herring. A way to criticize those who oppose their social agenda under the guise of science.
__________________
All you need to know about the energy crisis:
ANWR Exploration Republicans: 91% Supported. Democrats: 86% Opposed.
Coal-to-liquid R's: 90% YES. D's: 78% NO.
Oil Shale Exploration R's: 90% YES. D's: 86% NO.
Outer Continental Shelf Exploration R's: 81% YES. D's: 83% NO.
Increased Refinery Capacity R's: 97% YES. D's: 96% NO

SUMMARY: 91% of House Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of America’s own oil and gas. 86% of House Democrats have historically voted against.
Reply With Quote