Much play has been made of the wording to UN resolution 242 and the fact that it doesn’t say “the” territories or “all the” territories. But was that deliberate.

I myself know very well that the 1967 boundaries were not the original Partition boundaries and if the resolution had put in the “the” or “all the” that could only have meant that they wished to see the 1967 boundaries perpetuated in the form of a permanent frontier.

So obviously the UN was not prepared to recommend the 1967 Green line but the original partition boundary.