No worries friend.

"The Florida Supreme Court decision that was overturned in Bush v Gore was consistent with the plain language of the principal statute involved—the Florida statute governing contests of election certifications".[1]

So does a state have the right to run elections how they want to?

"The Rehnquist Court assert[ed] the judiciary’s role (or, in its words, “unsought responsibility”) to resolve the relevant constitutional questions rather than deferring to the political process."[2]

In today's political jargon, we call that judicial activism. And I'm no fan of Mr. Gore Vidal, but Bush v. Gore makes for strange bedfellows:

"Well, this gang is extraordinary in its looseness, dedicated as they are to the 10th Amendment; they then go and overthrow a supreme court, something someone who believes in states' rights could never have done."[3]

The 10th is clear:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

[1]here
[2]here
[3]here