View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2007, 11:36 AM
Mack's Avatar
Mack Mack is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,125
Mack is a splendid one to beholdMack is a splendid one to beholdMack is a splendid one to beholdMack is a splendid one to beholdMack is a splendid one to beholdMack is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 9,877
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rebellion";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack";p=&quot View Post
This is the kind of propaganda the Michael Moore uses.

He shows a completely sections where some guy had a wood working accident where he lost multiple fingers. He didn't have health insurance so he could only afford to get a couple of the fingers put on. Every system as big as Canada's health insurance program is going to have nightmare stories just like our private health care system has nightmare stories.
Moore's example is anecdotal, it is one person among millions. Whereas this article deals with a lot more than one and speaks to trends.
Yeah, I'm sure there aren't any example in the U.S. private health care industry where as many as 40 people have been screwed over. So 40 people among millions shows a trend but 1 does not. What about 5 people, or 10 people?


The article basically claims that it is some horrible thing to have people sent to the U.S. for treatment payed for by Canada's health program. Why exactly is that a bad thing? People get sent to the Mayo clinic all the time for specialists when local services are inadequate in the U.S. Why shouldn't Canada take advantage of the fact that they border the country with the best medical facilities in the world?
Reply With Quote