Socialist propaganda sites don't count as evidence. Sorry.

So you are saying you have no mainstream sources that support your claims?


Yes, I get it that you believe these socialist propaganda sites are real journalists. It explains your views.

Like most Americans, I don't accept liberal propaganda sites as real sources. Your sites are clearly biased. But more than that, they are also opinion pieces.


I know how to spell the major nations really well, but I tend not to think about Sweden very much.



Too bad he couldnt get Saddam to comply after the eight or tenth time he interfered with inspectors eh?

__________________
My Political Blog (Updated Oct 3rd) - Which Flame Warrior are you?

I'm beginning to notice that when the leftists around here realise they've lost at whatever the point of the origional debate was they change the topic to Iraq and when thsoe on the right realize the same they shift to 9/11 or general random liberal/socialist bashing.

At any rate I think the topic in the OP has been put to bed yes?

Bush in particular and past presidents in regards to Russia have had subordinates work out some arrangements and preconditions before face to face talks with the leaders.

And very commonly all talks that are needed are handled by subordiantes, diplomats and ambassadors as opposed to heads of state.

But even beyond that in this case Obama's seeming answer to "and what do you intend to achieve when you talk?" is to offer Iran goodies to stop their support of terrorists and attacks on he US. Which is appeasement by definition.

If we're agreed on that you may continue arguing about the legality of the Iraq war.