Quote:
Originally Posted by JP5";p="
So......David Levin tried it and is okay.....is that what you're saying?
No fingers lost; no toes lost; no permanent scars; no permanent damage whatsoever.....right?
So, did Levin tell us that if he were a terrorist with information to share to get himself out of such a treatment......was it bad enough that he thinks he would have talked? Isn't that the point of it, after all???
|
Maybe you ought to try it if you are fine with it JP. That way you can become a
valid spokesperson for the administration in reference to the issue of torture. You don't have a problem with it, so go for it....No worries, you won't lose any fingers or toes.
You're telling me that your definition of torture is;
Loss of extremities/permanent damage. It's obvious that you don't believe that there could possibly be mental or internal damage done....You have that "out of sight out of mind" thought process.
You are also short sighted because you don't see the damage done for the U.S. reputation by supporting torture.....in other words, we no longer have the moral upper hand.