View Single Post
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2007, 06:23 PM
Blade Blade is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,965
Blade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 21,473
Default xx

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vergilius";p=&quot View Post
I'm from MI, currently attending MSU. U of M never had an "anti-white" acceptance system, they had a point system based on a combination of such factors as economic background and ethnicity. Lets not forget that women regardless of race were also included as minorities in AA, as were many other marginal groups, not just blacks. Either way only the best of the best are accepted to U of M, they are "the Harvard of the north" (although I think university of chicago deserves that title more.
Complete, thorough-going nonsense. U of M's systematic discrimination in favor of minorities, which is inseperable logically from discrimination against whites, was brought out into the open in Gratz and Grutter, and not even contested by U of M, which successfully (and incredibly) offered the preposterous "diversity" argument. The "diversity" rationale for anti-white discrimination was quickly picked up not only by other universities, but also private companies all over the country to justify anti-white discrimination.
__________________
Blade: "more educated and literate people than Justabubba"

Justabubba: "that would include everyone"

http://politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=27847
Reply With Quote