Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBilly";p="
Quote:
Originally Posted by nonsqtr";p="
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoogiePeople";p="
Quote:
Originally Posted by shintao";p="
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoogiePeople";p="
Wonderful how the Socialists are trying to use our troops as bargaining chips during the Veterans Day weekend. The irony is delicious.
|
yep, on the one hand we have you wanting them dead, and on the other hand we socialists that want them alive. If we let them live we win, or if we give them money which was never denied, we also win. So we should give them the money and keep as many of them alive as we can by starting to bring them home, inspite of your wonderful pipe dreams to murder them before we can get them out of that hell hole. |
Or...
On one hand, they're fighting an enemy THERE
Or
On the other hand, they're making it so that we're not fighting an enemy HERE.
You socialists just want your cake, and to eat it too. You have this false sense of security, that the enemy will just wave, and say "bye" when we leave, and never come attack us on our homeland. What suckers you are. |
Nah, that's just more fear-mongering from the right.
There is no evidence whatsoever regarding a causal linkage between the war in Iraq, and "lack of attack on our homeland".
Just because you keep saying that, does not make iti true.
Try again. Maybe, use some better "logic" this time....  |
...because it's murky. Read the link below, and if you have a better plan, we all would love to hear it.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/securi...31-jenkins.htm
While our attention understandably is focused on the war in Iraq, the worldwide war against al Qaeda and affiliated terrorist enterprises continues. Unlike the fighting in Iraq, the campaign against the terrorists does not provide the continuing flow of televised images or battlefield displays. It is a war fought largely in the shadows. We measure its progress in the periodic arrests of terrorist leaders and the passage of time without a major terrorist attack. |
Global Security? Apologists for the Neo-Cons? Nice try.....
Nah, look, you guys keep
saying that - it's like, you keep pointing to this "murky metric" that no one can really measure - "periodic arrest of terrorist leaders and the passage of time without a major terrorist attack" -
But here's the
truth: you guys have
failed. You have
failed, thoroughly and unquestionably.
Show me Osama's head on a platter. Where is it? Where?
Do you even know where Osama is? How close can you narrow it down? A thousand miles? 500 maybe?
Every time you guys get
lucky and catch someone, you point to it as "success", but it's not, it's usually
dumb luck. For every one of those clowns you catch, there are hundreds more you don't. So, don't sit there and tell me your metric is "meaningful", until you show me
results - bring me Osama's head on a platter - show me
something -
anything -
'Cause all you've shown me so far, is a god-awful mess. The freakin' terrorists are still blowing up our boys over in Iraq, three years and a trillion dollars later. And there's only
ten thousand of those clowns.
Tops. So, why can't you guys round 'em up? Huh?
I'll tell you why - it's 'cause your freakin'
incompetent, that's why. Your Commander-In-Chief is a god(*)(*)(*)(*)
moron, and he couldn't implement his way out of a paper bag.
Show me results. Goddamit. Or else, stop spending my money.
