View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2007, 05:08 PM
nonsqtr nonsqtr is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Burbank CA
Posts: 6,049
nonsqtr has disabled reputation
Credits: 59,049
Default oh, that guy....

Yeah, him... well, I was thinking of the "rest" of those clowns, mostly....

But yeah, I hear you.

Nah, I was just ... ah.... what is it the black folks say.... "representing", that's it.

You know, I mean, you hear me too, right?

It's like, you know, freakin' Bozo over there, our C-n-C, could have done a lot more with a trillion bucks, that's for sure.

I mean, kinda where I stand on this thing, is that I support the "goal" (such as it's been explained to me, although I'm still not entirely clear on why it keeps shifting all over the map) - but I just think Bushie is going about this in entirely the wrong way.

You know, like I posted on the other thread, I mean, we got real threats, right?

And these terrorist clowns.... they're kinda, I dunno, how would you put it, "stupid enough to be dangerous", that kinda thing? You know, tryin' to light their shoes on fire, 'n all....

And you know, truth is, any Columbine kid could go buy some fertilizer or something, and.... well.....

I just don't think Iraq is all that important, that's all. Not like, a trillion bucks' worth. Not that important. A little important maybe. But I'd "for sure" rather be puttin' all that money somewhere else. Like, real homeland security, might be a good place to start. You know, borders, protecting the infrastructure, that kinda thing.... But I mean... Iraq???? Nah, we're just pissing away our money there. There ain't nothin' good gonna come out of that, "even if we win". So.....

You know - yeah - there's definitely threats, right? "A" threat - the terrorists represent "a" threat.

Out of all the gazillions we're faced with, they're "a" threat. And I mean, our entire strategy, this "pre-emption" bit, is based on something that hasn't even happened yet. The terrorists do not have nuclear weapons, right? Or any other kind of WMD, right? So, like, we're basing our entire foreign policy, and a big chunk of our domestic policy, on something that hasn't even happened. It's like, we're protecting ourselves from a pipe dream, a fantasy, a pie-in-the-sky "might happen someday" scenario.

I mean, all that's happened so far, is "one" thing, and that's only 'cause Bushie screwed up on the intelligence yet again, so.....

Yeah, I just question the sanity of Bushie and his clown parade.

I mean, like, these guys are tossing all their eggs (and that means, by extension, "our" eggs) into one single basket, and meanwhile there's like thousands of other important things that are falling by the wayside.

Not the least of which is the Constitution.
Reply With Quote