Quote:
Originally Posted by halla";p="
ashley: [
the absurdity of what you say can be put this way - what you say and what you meant to say as the author of you post has no meaning. i will tell you what you meant by what you said and you must believe me that i know better than you on what you said!
ashley demonstrates beggared logic. especially without consulting the author on the author's intent! you begin to sound like arafat interpreting un resolution 194 as the definition of the Palestinians "sacred right of return" while urging violence against Israel.
Quote:
|
11. Resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible;
|
|
For UN GA resolutions it is not what the Author intended but what the GA intends by voting. The Authors (UK) abstained.
It has always been the right of People to return to their own property irrespective of boundary changes. Para 11 resolution was only stating normal practice not a "Palestinian sacred right" but all peoples right.