View Single Post
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 09:26 AM
Rebellion's Avatar
Rebellion Rebellion is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 13,995
usa
Rebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 124,425
Default It's a hell of a thing, killin' a man

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rebellion";p=&quot View Post
the US wants to be there so I wouldn't call them parasites. It's a landing stop between here and Europe so the US considers it a strategic location. It's mutually beneficial.
We carry a titanic defense budget so that we can save their asses in case of attack, and they give us an airstrip. Garsh, anyone can see that's an even swap.
I'm pretty sure our titanic defense budget isn't in place just so we can save Iceland. If it wasn't important to the US then the US wouldn't be there any more.
__________________
All you need to know about the energy crisis:
ANWR Exploration Republicans: 91% Supported. Democrats: 86% Opposed.
Coal-to-liquid R's: 90% YES. D's: 78% NO.
Oil Shale Exploration R's: 90% YES. D's: 86% NO.
Outer Continental Shelf Exploration R's: 81% YES. D's: 83% NO.
Increased Refinery Capacity R's: 97% YES. D's: 96% NO

SUMMARY: 91% of House Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of America’s own oil and gas. 86% of House Democrats have historically voted against.
Reply With Quote