Quote:
Originally Posted by masterproctor";p="
The first part:
|
See my previous link for my take on some of these interpretations. I'm not going to parse through what "virgin birth" could equate to on every single one of these, but the fact is, there are many similarities in these myths.
Look, the point is CHRISTIANITY IS A CONSTRUCT. That is quite easy to discern.
For example, the Bible contains many inaccuracies and stories of impossibilities such as a talking donkey:
Numbers 22:28-30, NAS
28 And the Lord opened the mouth of the donkey, and she said to Balaam, “What have I done to you, that you have struck me these three times?” 29 Then Balaam said to the donkey, “Because you have made a mockery of me! If there had been a sword in my hand, I would have killed you by now.” 30 And the donkey said to Balaam, “Am I not your donkey on which you have ridden all your life to this day? Have I ever been accustomed to do so to you?” And he said, “No.”
Have you ever seen a talking donkey? If you say "yes" you're crazy. They don't exist, and never have.
Organized religion is a tool used to control people. All the religions are an attempt to explain God, but they ultimately place power in the hands of religious leaders instead of teaching true spirituality.
We had
a longer debate on this subject here.
Quote:
The second part:
I had made up my mind about this section before I even watched it, so that's why I really decided to look up the facts after this documentary. No, I don't believe 9/11 was a conspiracy by the government to blow up the WTC. I had read too many scientific journals that "debunked" the myths concerning 9/11 not to mention the practicalities of the situation. Why would Bush have Osama Bin Laden be the sponsor of the attacks with all Saudis, Jordanians and Syrians and yet no Iraqis? Why set up a scenario that has no links to Saddam Hussein, yet claim later that bin Laden and Hussein are connected?
|
My mind is still not made up on this section either, however, as I'm checking the sources on this one, I'm having trouble refuting many of them.
Take the first one - "No Warnings" - Bush, Condi Rice, and Cheney clearly stated there was no way anyone could have had warning or known they would fly planes into buildings. I checked each of those newspaper articles with warnings from various governments, and the fact that our own government had run exercises involving planes flying into buildings at an earlier time. SO SOMEONE IS LYING ON THAT POINT
Look at the reasons Karen Kwiatkowski gave for leaving the Pentagon. She tells you about the deception used by the administration in misrepresenting intelligence reports here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1oPEfa9Lws