View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2007, 05:17 PM
MRMAGQQ MRMAGQQ is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: USA (Full-time RVer)
Posts: 561
MRMAGQQ is on a distinguished road
Credits: 3,207
Default There's nothing to debate

Quote:
Originally Posted by TarBaby";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuH2";p=&quot View Post
Do I care to opine on the basis of your fallacy?

Nope.
Then what are you on this site for if not to debate? And what fallacy are you talking about? The Bill of Rights states that we have a right to to privacy unless a warrant is obtained. The government is eavesdropping on citizens without one. Whats the fallacy?
You're just trying to revive the same old lame looney-left argument that has been pretty much discredited numerous times in the past, on this board.

If you read the Fourth Amendment, you'll find it mentions something about "unreasonable" search and seizure without a warrant. I'm not worrying about the government reading any of my normal, everyday emails, because I don't correspond with any known terrorists. Now, if I were to get hold of Osama bin Laden's email address, and send him a little "Hi, how're ya doin'" note, you can bet your rearend that there would be all kinds of bells and alarms going off, and the feds would be knocking at my door. I take huge comfort in knowing that the "gatekeepers" are doing their job. I feel kind of silly arguing against a non-argument.
__________________
http://www.freedomswatch.org/Home/tabid/36/Default.aspx

When religion ruled the world...wasn't that the Dark Ages?
Reply With Quote