Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBilly";p="
You seem to be throwing stuff against the wall to see if any of it sticks.
|
You seem to be dodging my points and questions. No answers for them?
Quote:
|
This topic has many law experts challenging it, and for the most part, they have not made much headway.
|
In large part due to the circular problem of "state secrets" and the Justice Depts. unwillingness to cooperate. You do see how its difficult to prove a secret violation of the law if the government keeps it secret?
Quote:
|
So unless you can provide the names of those targeted, and unless you are an expert on constitutional law, your points are nothing but your opinion.
|
Since none of us are political experts maybe we should all just close up our browsers and not post again? I may be no expert on the Constitution, but I sure try to have a reasonable understanding as an civic minded citizen should.
The fact still remains that if the NSA is fighting to have the ability to wiretap citizens without warrants and to provide amnesty for telecoms that have helped, it stands to reason that they have, in fact, wiretapped citizens without warrants. That seems pretty simple, even to a lowly non-expert like myself.