guys, 'xcuse me for buttin' in here. but ah.....
Hey Billie and all y'all, um.... this issue, it seems to me, is not about whether wiretapping is "wrong", or whether anyone has wire-tapped "you".
This issue is about whether private corporations, when asked by the government to violate the law, must refuse, or take the consequences.
The government is essentially saying, they don't have to take the consequences.
And from where I stand, that's an outrage.
When you or I violate the law, we have to take the consequences.
And the "full spectrum" of consequences - criminal, civil, and everything else.
But the government doesn't want their stinkin' corporate minions to be held responsible for their actions.
These Statist bastids want the law to be "whatever the government says it is", and that is wrong. It is absolutely freakin' WRONG, and I don't care if you're a Republican or a Democrat, you gotta admit that it's WRONG.
There is no entity in the United States, that is above the law.
None.
That's the way it should be.
Not even the President himself, is above the law.
So, why should the corps be above the law?
Can someone please explain to me, why corporations should be exempt from following the law?
|