View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 02:34 PM
ashleykennedy ashleykennedy is offline
Banned
Analyst
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 2,287
uk european union
ashleykennedy is an unknown quantity at this point
Credits: 23,808
Default And squatters are legitimate military targets.

Quote:
Originally Posted by concheet";p=&quot View Post
War Crimes: The Prohibition Against Targeting Civilians

A fundamental rule of international humanitarian law is that civilians must enjoy general protection against danger arising from military operations. The rule of civilian immunity is one of "the oldest fundamental maxims" of international customary law, meaning that it is binding on all parties to a conflict, regardless of whether a conflict is international or non-international in character.

Non-state parties to a conflict are also obliged to respect the norms of customary international law. At all times, it is forbidden to direct attacks against civilians; indeed, to attack civilians intentionally while aware of their civilian status is a war crime. It is thus an imperative duty for an attacker to identify and distinguish non-combatants from combatants in every situation.

In addition to its status as established customary law, the principle of civilian immunity has been codified in numerous treaties. One of the clearest expressions of the principle is set out in article 51(2) of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, which states:
  • The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence, the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population, are prohibited.

By deliberately targeting civilians, suicide bombing attacks clearly violate this most fundamental rule of the laws of war. The prohibition against targeting civilians holds in all circumstances, including when a party undertakes such attacks in retaliation for attacks on its own civilians (discussed below).

The principle of distinction between civilian and military targets is enshrined in article 48 of Protocol I:
  • In order to ensure respect for and protection of the civilian population and civilian objects, the Parties to the conflict shall at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants, and between civilian objects and military objectives, and accordingly shall direct their operations only against military objectives.
Military objectives are defined as "those objects, which by their nature, location, purpose or use make an effective contribution to military action." Under international humanitarian law, attacks that are not, or as a result of the method of attack cannot, be aimed at military targets, are considered "indiscriminate." They are prohibited under Protocol I and, under the same treaty, constitute war crimes. The protocol's provisions prohibiting indiscriminate warfare are considered to be norms of customary international law, binding on all parties in a conflict, regardless of whether it is an international or internal armed conflict.

That is, they are binding on all parties to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, even though Israel has not ratified Protocol I.

================
The Kassams are indiscriminate and a war crime
Well that proves that Israel practices War Crimes and crimes against humanity.

11 June 1998: The Israeli army issued an order allowing for the establishment of the so-called civil guards, or armed militia, in the Jewish settlements in the West Bank. On the same day, the Israeli army issued another order granting the settlement "Ariel" the formal status of a city, implicitly indicating that it was no longer part of the occupied territory.

And that any squatter violence is a war crime and a crime against Humanity.

And squatters are legitimate military targets.

Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field (Geneva I) Aug 12, 1949 July 6, 1951

Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea (Geneva II) Aug 12, 1949 July 6, 1951

Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (Geneva III) Aug 12, 1949 July 6, 1951

Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (Geneva IV) Aug 12, 1949 July 6, 1951

Israeli MFA

Who hasn't signed up for additional protocols 1? Israel, Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan and Iraq, what exalted company Israel keeps.

Who hasn't signed up for additional protocols 2? Israel, Afghanistan and Iraq. As they say known by the company they keep.

The Palestinians as a non-sovereign state cannot sign.
Reply With Quote