"The arbitrary moment that you can't seem to define doesn't justify giving them less rights at fetal stages."
why cant that apply to sperm?
"I don't understand. What type of qualities?"
any qualities. you kind of touched on this below.
"No, I don't consider animals equal to humans. They don't have the proper brain structure to take part in society and they are lower on the food chain. They do serve whatever purposes and shouldn't be abused."
embryos/early fetuses dont have proper brain structure to take part in society either. lower on the food chain doesnt really say much. we eat them because we can, thats all there is to it really. what is abuse? no mistreating/killing unless its for food? why is it not abuse when done with this purpose?
"Death row prisoners have been given the right to live and they made the choice to take the lives of others. Since they don't have the right to kill others, killing them is a justifiable punishment."
well, they didnt violate their "right to live." why isnt jailing them enough? if you kill them youre also take lives of others, isnt that kinda hypocritical in a prolife sense?
"People on life support are at the mercy of any wills, or guardians. They made their choices on guardians and legal documents so it is their will what the decision is."
embryos/early fetuses are at the mercy of their one guardian, and theyre even more unresponsive than most people on life support. they obviously cant make any choices without fully developed brains or means of communication.
do you see where im going with this?
|