View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2008, 01:49 PM
raytri's Avatar
raytri raytri is online now
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minnesota
Age: 40
Posts: 15,760
usa us minnesota
raytri has a brilliant futureraytri has a brilliant futureraytri has a brilliant futureraytri has a brilliant futureraytri has a brilliant futureraytri has a brilliant futureraytri has a brilliant futureraytri has a brilliant futureraytri has a brilliant futureraytri has a brilliant futureraytri has a brilliant future
Credits: 100,006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade View Post
And that "determination" has always been, and remains arbitrary. So fetuses are to live or die based on a completely arbitrary "line"?
Almost all legal lines are arbitrary -- that is, they could have been drawn somewhere else. Nearly all political and legal debate comes down to where to draw lines.

Take murder, for instance. Seems like a slam-dunk, right? Murder is wrong.

Except we have not one, but multiple arbitrary lines regarding murder. What's the difference between first- and second-degree murder? And between those and manslaughter? And self-defense? And involuntary homicide? And so on. We recognize many shades of culpability when it comes to killing. And deciding where a given case should fall is not always easy.

In abortion, drawing the line at "viability" is no more or less arbitrary than drawing the line at "conception" or "birth".
__________________
Man up.
Reply With Quote