Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade
Now you're lapsing into the incoherent blather of the unschooled who read pages 356-357 in a physics book, and start pontificating.  You take the well known fact that there is a discrepancy between the predictions of GR and QM at a gravitational singularity, you "vote" for the QM solution, and then you think you've "disproved" GR. All quite hilarious.  |
Your reading comprehension needs improvement! Where did I post or imply that I voted for the QM solution?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade
Oh, I get it - you think that a theory that is sometimes correct, is correct? By that reasoning, the theory that it's always four o'clock is correct, since it's true twice a day. |
Your logic skills need improving. your analogy is not correct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade
Only for the devout of the global warming religion.  |
You have no argument against the science so you resort to inane accusations.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawn Boy
Why do you keep bringing up the debate is over? Your still posting aren't you?
|
As per my post 162: The
scientific debate is over. Only the political debate against AGW by the rightwingnutjobs goes on.