View Single Post
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 02-06-2008, 11:23 PM
Blade Blade is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,965
Blade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 21,474
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMS View Post
nope, sorry blade. viability isnt arbitrary, roe v wade.

there is definitely more reason for it. the baby can survive outside of the mothers body and is responsive to stimuli at that point, too.
That the baby can survive outside the womb and respond to stimuli means nothing more than that the baby can survive outside the womb and respond to stimuli. I didn't say "viability" is arbitrary - I said the chosing of this as an abortion criterion is arbitrary. One might as well say if alpha brain waves appear at five months, THAT's the cutoff point, or if fingers appear at two months, THAT's the cutoff point. Picking some stage of fetal development and saying that's the cutoff point is completely arbitrary, minus any supporting ethical reasoning, or medical argument as to when life begins, and with you, it's always "minus".
__________________
Blade: "more educated and literate people than Justabubba"

Justabubba: "that would include everyone"

http://politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=27847
Reply With Quote