View Single Post
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 02-07-2008, 12:30 PM
Blade Blade is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,965
Blade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 21,471
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMS View Post
its only the issue for your side. a starting point for life cant really be determined, so its pointless.
No body has ever tried to determine that, since the pro-aborts won at the starting line from the infamous USSC decision - the issue, NEVER analyzed is moot for them, they don't care. And sorry, I don't recognize YOU as an authority on the subject.

Quote:
when life begins is irrelevant because it cant be known
.

No proof, no arguments - you don't know what you're talking about, you have no credentials, your statement is meaningless.

Quote:
you could say the exact same about sperm - certainly alive and of the same species. the cut off point is known as viability, because its the only practical solution.
"Only practical solution" - whatt?? Who knows what you're talking about?? Nobody. You make arbitrary assertions and refuse to rebut counter arguments. You're just talking to yourself.


Quote:
"BOTH sides"

haha. only those who view the situation scientifically can be trusted with an objective decision.
YOU don't view the situation scientifically - you make bald assertions about "viability", link them to an abortion cutoff point with no convincing argument, while brushing past the onset of human life issue, and think you're being "scientific".

Quote:
the others would simply claim to know something they couldnt possibly know.
Didn't I just SAY I didn't know in the last post?? Do you get in a thread and just listen to yourself? Within ONE POST you distort my position. How can anyone debate with a person who does that?

Quote:
supposing it did come down the the beginning of life, people who come to conclusions before conducting any tests cant be trusted.
Of all the (*)(*)(*)(*) nerve - I'M THE ONE WHO ASKED FOR A DEBATE INCLUDING SICENTISTS, remember?? One post ago??

Quote:
roe v wade wasnt worst reasoned. it made the best possible decision based on the available information. yes, its reasonable to consider a fetus to be alive, but the same could be said of many stages of human life in its distinct forms, which is why thats a pointless argument.
You don't know what you're talking about - it's even been criticized by pro-abortionists.

Hello out there?? Any pro-abortionists who can at least read the opponent's post and keep even a feeble hold on coherence wanna debate?
__________________
Blade: "more educated and literate people than Justabubba"

Justabubba: "that would include everyone"

http://politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=27847
Reply With Quote