View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 02-10-2008, 07:55 PM
usgrant7's Avatar
usgrant7 usgrant7 is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Victor, NY
Age: 47
Posts: 871
usa us new york
usgrant7 is a splendid one to beholdusgrant7 is a splendid one to beholdusgrant7 is a splendid one to beholdusgrant7 is a splendid one to beholdusgrant7 is a splendid one to beholdusgrant7 is a splendid one to beholdusgrant7 is a splendid one to beholdusgrant7 is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 7,619
Send a message via MSN to usgrant7
Icon6 Props to my right honorable colleague…

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMS View Post
correction:

"im no chicken little. evolutionary theory is well supported by science; bringing it into question would make science as a whole vulnerable to non science."

"im no chicken little. evolutionary theory is well supported by science; successfully bringing it into question without employing the scientific method, would make science as a whole vulnerable to non science." poorly worded, i know (thanks for the pm, usgrant). my point is the same: if some insist on broadening science so that religion can be included, evolutionary theory will not be the only thing that suffers.
I now yield the balance of my time back to the chair.
__________________
"I know no method to secure the repeal of bad or obnoxious laws so effective as their stringent execution." March 4, 1869, Grant's First Inaugural Address
Reply With Quote