View Single Post
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2008, 06:57 AM
junjobx2199's Avatar
junjobx2199 junjobx2199 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: FLA
Posts: 569
usa us florida
junjobx2199 is a jewel in the roughjunjobx2199 is a jewel in the roughjunjobx2199 is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 3,519
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sunnyside View Post


See that's what I'm talking about the with post just above his. McCain thought he could get away with explaining what he meant in the sentence after he said "100 years". We tried pointing it out in this thread. We could continue until we're blue in the face. But the above is all a fair amount of the population is going to hear.

Actually as things are going there is some chance the Iraq government would be able to regain it's balance and stand on it's own if we pull the rug out from under them. But maybe not (probably not?). However despite some seriously poor planning on Bush's part initially (figuring the different groups would get along and play nice), it does look like we have a fair shot at getting a functional democratic Iraq.
Please stop and smell the Nescafe, there is no way to take a direct statement out of context. He said that the American people could accept 10, 20, and 100 years if it meant no American causalities . How do you take that out of context and even if he didn’t mean what he actually said then how do you interpret what he said and please do not insert word into it that he did not say! Did he mean it metaphorically??

Last edited by junjobx2199; 02-16-2008 at 06:58 AM. Reason: a 2nd thought
Reply With Quote