Why is this debate still going on?

Are usgrant and others suggesting that because scientists are momentarily unable to prove I. Complex parts in flaggelum (sp?) are the direct result of evolutionary processes, that we should just assume it proves "god?

usgrant keeps bringing up bizarre scenarios to "prove" his case.

Neutron Stars are extremely dense.

Have we proven that in a labratory? No.

The exact mass of neutron star cores has been calculated, but have we ever tested it in a lab? no.

Dembski and the other ID guys are all pushing a religious agenda. They searched and searched and searched, and finally found something that evolution can not easily explain.

That does not prove the existance of god. It doesn't mean he doesn't exist, but it certainly does not prove he does.

Its just a momentary gap in the science.

ID people want to throw in the towel, the scientists want to use "science" to solve the question.

Ixtellor

__________________
_______________________________________
George W. Bush "I don't think our troops ought to be used for what's called nation-building"

Blasphemy is a victimless crime.