View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 07:14 AM
concheet's Avatar
concheet concheet is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 606
usa
concheet will become famous soon enough
Credits: 7,800
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raytri View Post
I'll note that you're using a different version of Chronicles than I am. But in any event, what you have is Asa swearing an oath to God, including promising to kill all nonbelievers. "All of Judah" rejoiced at the oath", and the Lord rewarded them for their devotion.

Well, that's one way to rationalize ignoring unpleasant things in one's holy book.
Well, that's one way to read it but I think it is not only mistaken, but demonstrates your bias. It is obviousthat that portion was added by the Chronicler. The oath was not to kill for God but to entered[s] the covenant to seek the Lord, the God of their forefathers, with all their heart and with all their soul. Their reward was peace with their neighbors.

In fact the covenant was entered into because:

3. Now there were many days for Israel without a true God and without an instructing priest, and without the Torah.
4. And they returned to the Lord, the God of Israel, when they were in distress, and they sought Him, and He was found by them.
5. And in those times, there was no peace for anyone going or coming for there were great turmoils upon all the inhabitants of the lands.
6. And nation was crushed by nation and city by city, because God discomfited them with all troubles.

7. But you be strong and let your hands not slacken, for there is reward for your work."

It is not my holy book, fyi. I am merely a student of the religions. My version is the Jewish Bible, (not a Christian translation) here: http://www.chabad.org/library/articl...Chapter-15.htm

Quote:
Originally Posted by raytri View Post
Oh, please. Leviticus is a listing of laws. There's every reason to think they were enforced. Especially because, as I said, it's not like the laws would have been unusual for the time.
Actually they were unusual at the time. Do you know of any other codified law that demonstrates your point? As far as I know the ethics and morality laws as well as the hygiene laws were not in effect with any other culture. The laws that were enforced were generally enforced on all Jews, not merely the by and for the elite.

Quote:
Originally Posted by raytri View Post
I'll grant that the Quran is more violent, in quantity if not in quality. But that doesn't mean that the violent parts must rule or dominate, and be emulated literally, any more than similar passages in other religions cannot be tamed. It's easy enough to read the Quran as the story of a warlord who spread a religion, not a religion that requires war.
Only if you read it with a much more forgiving eye than you are reading the Bible! To quote you :" Well, that's one way to rationalize ignoring unpleasant things in one's holy book."

The problem is that unless you are willing to meet violence with even more violence you will be dominated by those (however small the group) who in fact use the violence to rule and dominate others. If a violent Muslim meets a turn-the-other-cheek Christian, the Muslim wins and eventually dominates. And even if 99% of Muslims were peaceloving, 1% can cause incredible havoc in the world.

My prediction:
By the time Islam is 'tamed,' your descendants will be praying 5 times a day and reading the Koran in Arabic.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4x0bU...watch_response
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL0C2QvqIlo#
"The courageous over the infidels, make war for Allah and are not afraid... This is the depiction of the army of Allah that will come at Allah's decree, from here or from there, to liberate these lands from the defilement of the Jews, for Allah was angry with them in his book and called them once 'monkeys,' once 'swine,' and once 'donkeys.'" (Palestinian TV, March 30, 2001)
Reply With Quote